While selecting the team Pakistan also forgot that they had Hammad Azam in the team who is a right arm medium pace bowler and a handy lower-middle order batsman and would have served well instead of Aizaz Cheema. Pakistan had 7 batsman, four pure tailenders but nothing in between.
When Shahid Afridi was bowled by James Andersen Pakistan required 44 of 34 balls, but had no one to support Misbah ul Haq and lost the match by 20 runs which they could have easily won.
Pakistani management for some reason has been hesitant to play Hammad Azam in the team, maybe because he is capable enough to take over the all rounder's slot which has been occupied by under performing Abdul Razzaq, Shoaib Malik and on some occasions Sohail Tanvir. They are a well balanced test side, but look totally imbalanced when it comes to ODI matches.
There are a few slots that need to be filled especially the opening partnership, they need someone who can stay there and play long. A young performing all rounder in the lower-middle order who could bowl economical overs and score precious runs, but more importantly and a quick genuine fast bowler who could rip through batting line ups on these slow low pitches.
With Pakistan's recent rise and new found consistency in all forms of the game, there were calls for current interim coach Mohsin Khan to be retained as permanent coach. Whilst things are going well, Mohsin's brand of encouragement and arm around the shoulder with the occasional tap on the behind, seems more than an adequate form of coaching in the eyes of many fans and pundits. Yet I'm not convinced it is. It is when things go wrong that the coach really does his job, and in the first ODI of the series against England, things went badly wrong. It will be interesting to see how the Pakistan team reacts in this ODI series, but here is where you need a proper coach in my opinion, to spot the intricacies behind any bad performance and help the players iron them out. A 'don't worry boys, we can put it right in the next game' simply will not suffice.


Three reds and a batsman is out, one green and his not out. I have no problem with them two aspects, but the third light, the gold one, is a stinker. As I keep emphasising, the DRS was made to eradicate umpire errors, all the umpires call has done is made the umpire look as though he has made the correct call. In the Pakistan, England series we have seen number of decisions that have stayed on the umpires call when they should not have done. Take two identical deliveries, if the umpire says out to one it stays out and not-out to the other that decision also stays. Totally unfair, to say the least. Hawk-Eye is a great innovation, but needs to be used in the correct manner.
Attack is the best form of defense. This famous proverb rings true in times when the Big Bashes
Younis Khan and Azhar Ali's double-century partnership provided Pakistan the command over the 3rd Test as England begin their chase for 324 runs.
GeoSuper